| WASHINGTON (JTA) — During the late 1930s, Hitler’s
persecution of Jews was building to a frenzy even as fears of a war
escalated. Nevertheless, General Motors’ German automotive
subsidiary, Opel, remained a loyal corporate citizen of the Third
Reich — content to obediently do the Nazi regime’s bidding, and
unstintingly supporting Hitler’s program on many fronts. These
included economic and employment recovery, anti-Jewish persecution,
war preparedness and domestic propaganda. In return, Opel prospered.
Hitler was
pleased — very pleased. In 1938, just months after the Nazis’
annexation of Austria, James D. Mooney, head of GM’s overseas
operations, received the German Eagle with Cross, the highest medal
Hitler awarded to foreign commercial collaborators and supporters.
On Nov. 9-10, 1938, shortly after Mooney’s decoration, nationwide
pogroms broke out in Germany against the Jews — Kristallnacht. The
American public was finally shocked onto its heels by the night of
officially orchestrated burning, looting and mob action again Jews.
President Roosevelt recalled America’s ambassador, plunging
German-American relations to their lowest point since Hitler assumed
power. All things American came under special scrutiny in Germany.
By now, the truth about GM’s ownership of the Opel car and truck
operation was out in the open among Germans. Reich armament
officials increasingly directed Opel’s output, including mandating
that nearly all vehicles be devoted to military use.
These are among the many findings of a JTA investigation.
Thousands of pages of decades’-old documents were scrutinized and
re-examined to produce this series, which sheds new light on GM’s
relationship with the Third Reich — and on the company’s activities
in America. They reveal that even as GM was helping jump-start the
resurgent German military, it was undermining America’s electric
mass transit, and in doing so helped spawn America’s unquenchable
thirst for oil. GM has declined comment for this story. The company
has steadfastly denied for decades that it actively assisted the
Nazi war effort or that it simultaneously subverted mass transit in
the United States.
Laissez faire, Sloan-style
In the months leading up to the feared 1939 invasion of Poland,
Alfred P. Sloan, GM’s president, defended his close collaboration
with Hitler. Brushing off attacks for his partnership with a Nazi
regime already notorious for filling concentration camps, taking
over Austria and now threatening to install the Master Race across
Europe, Sloan was stony and proud.
He stated, in a long April 1939 letter to an objecting
stockholder, that in the interests of making a profit, GM shouldn’t
risk alienating its German hosts by intruding in Nazi affairs. “In
other words, to put the proposition rather bluntly,” Sloan said in
the letter, “such matters should not be considered the business of
the management of General Motors.”
Indeed, in August of 1939, the world wondered when Hitler might
invade Poland. During those days, Opel, under the direct day-to-day
supervision of GM’s senior executive, Cyrus Osborn, played its role
in Germany’s fast-paced military plans. The company was already
manufacturing thousands of Blitz trucks that would become a mainstay
of the Reich’s upcoming Blitzkrieg.
The German military in early August urgently ordered Blitz truck
spare parts to be delivered to Reich bases near the Polish border.
Days later in August, nearly 3,000 Opel employees, from factory
workers to senior managers, were drafted into the Wehrmacht.
Moreover, at about that time, GM’s Osborn began evacuating most of
the American employees and their families to the Netherlands. Soon,
virtually all Opel civilian passenger car sales were eliminated in
favor of military orders.
At 6 a.m. on Sept. 1, 1939, Germany launched its Blitzkrieg
against Poland, with troops arriving in Blitz trucks manufactured by
GM’s Opel. The night before, Sloan reportedly told stockholders that
GM was “too big” to be impeded by “petty international squabbles,”
according to a congressional investigation.
Shortly after war broke out in Europe, however, GM executives in
Germany tried to distance the American company from its involvement
in the brutal German war machine. The Opel board was restructured to
ensure that GM executives maintained a controlling presence on the
board of directors but continued invisibility in daily management.
This was accomplished in part by bringing in GM’s reliable Danish
chief, Albin Madsen, and maintaining two Americans on that board.
The company’s 1939 annual report, released in April 1940, stated:
“With full recognition of the responsibility that the manufacturing
facilities of Adam Opel A.G. must now assume under a war regime, the
Corporation has withdrawn the American personnel formerly in
executive charge… and has turned the administrative responsibilities
over to German nationals.”
However, GM was still masquerading. By the summer of 1940, a
senior GM executive wrote a more honest assessment for internal
circulation only. He explained that while “the management of Adam
Opel A.G. is in the hands of German nationals,” in point of fact, GM
is still “actively represented by two American executives on the
Board of Directors.”
The construction and German-American balance of the many
management entities created in the facade of control was constantly
shifting during the Hitler years. But regardless of the number of
members — German or American — on the various directing, managing or
executive boards and committees, GM in the United States controlled
all voting stock and could veto or permit all operations.
For all intents and purposes, though, once war began, Wehrmacht
requirements and orders determined the specifics of military
manufacturing at Opel. Like any nation at war, including the United
States itself, the Reich alone determined what weapons would be made
by its militarized factories. That said, it was GM’s decision to
remain operating in Germany, to continue to subject itself to Reich
military orders, and answer the Reich’s call for ever more lethal
weapons.
As anticipated, Opel’s Brandenburg facilities were conscripted
and converted to an airplane-engine plant supplying the Luftwaffe’s
JU-88 bombers. Later, Opel’s plants also built land mines and
torpedo detonators. The factories and infrastructure that GM built
during the 1930s were in fact finally used for their intended
purpose — war. Opel-built trucks on the ground, Opel-powered bombers
in the sky and Opel-detonated torpedoes in the seas brought terror
to Europe.
Back in the United States, Sloan tried to obstruct FDR’s war
preparedness planning. The GM chief tried to dissuade GM executives
with needed manufacturing and production experience from helping
Washington’s early mobilization plans. In one typical 1940 case,
Sloan asked Danish-born William Knudson, who had ascended to become
president of GM, not to leave the company and help Washington’s war
efforts. Sloan, who had become chairman of the company in 1937,
warned his friend that the Roosevelt administration would make a
“monkey out of you.”
Knudson replied, “That isn’t important, Mr. Sloan. I came to this
country [from Denmark] with nothing. It has been good to me. Rightly
or wrongly, I feel I must go.” Sloan retorted, “That’s a quixotic
way of looking at it.” By mid-1940, with or without Sloan’s
acquiescence, GM had been drafted by Washington to become a major
war supplier for the Allies. Sloan had no choice but to comply, and
GM and its employees would ultimately make enormously valuable
contributions to the Allied war effort.
In June 1940, Sloan brought Mooney back to America to head up
GM’s key participation in America’s crash program to prepare for
war. He was installed as an assistant to the new GM president to
take “full charge of all negotiations [with Washington] involving
defense equipment …”
Mooney’s mere appointment sent shivers through the anti-Nazi
boycott and protest committee, which well remembered his 1938 medal
for what the Nazis had termed “service to the Reich.” The
Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi League railed in a letter to Roosevelt: “How
should we interpret the placing of a Hitler sympathizer and a Hitler
servant (one must render service to the Reich to deserve such a
medal) at the throttle of our defense program? Doesn’t that appear
suspiciously similar to the planting of Nazi sympathizers in key
positions…?”
Collusion but no disloyalty
In June 1940, about the same time Mooney returned to America,
Sloan wrote to a colleague, expressing disdain for FDR’s democracy
while grudgingly acknowledging his admiration for Hitler’s fascist
drive, even if that drive had become criminal.
“It seems clear that the Allies are outclassed on mechanical
equipment,” Sloan wrote, “and it is foolish to talk about
modernizing their Armies in times like these, they ought to have
thought of that five years ago. There is no excuse for them not
thinking of that except for the unintelligent, in fact, stupid,
narrow-minded and selfish leadership which the democracies of the
world are cursed with.”
Sloan added a poignant contrast: “… But when some other system
develops stronger leadership, works hard and long, and intelligently
and aggressively — which are good traits — and, superimposed upon
that, develops the instinct of a racketeer, there is nothing for the
democracies to do but fold up. And that is about what it looks as if
they are going to do.”
When at the end of 1940 the White House began to insist that GM
break off relations with Latin American car dealers suspected of
being pro-Nazi, Sloan defiantly refused. He lashed out at
Washington, accusing it of protecting Communists at home while
focusing on GM dealers in South America. “I have flatly declined to
cancel dealers,” Sloan wrote in April 1941 to Walter Carpenter, a GM
board member and vice president of du Pont.
Days later, on April 18, 1941, Carpenter retorted, “I think that
General Motors has to consider this problem from three standpoints;
first, from the commercial, second, the patriotic and, third, the
public relations standpoint....We are definitely a part of the
nation here and our future is very definitely mingled with the
future of this country. The country today seems to be pretty well
committed to a policy opposite to Germany and Italy.”
Carpenter continued with a blunt warning. “If we don’t listen to
the urgings of the State Department in this connection,” he said,
“it seems to me just a question of time... The effect of this will
be to associate the General Motors with Nazi or Fascist propaganda
against the interests of the United States...The effect on the
General Motors Corporation might be a very serious matter and the
feeling might last for years.”
A few weeks later, in May 1941, a year-and-a-half after World War
II broke out, with newspapers and newsreels constantly transmitting
the grim news that millions had been displaced, murdered, or
enslaved by Nazi aggression and that London was decimated by the
Blitz bombing campaign, Sloan, then in his mid-60s, told his closest
executives during a Detroit briefing: “I am sure we all realize that
this struggle that is going on though the World is really nothing
more or less than a conflict between two opposing technocracies
manifesting itself to the capitalization of economic resources and
products and all that sort of thing.”
He then continued in a rambling, incoherent fashion, trying to
further justify the company’s Nazi business dealings.
By now, Assistant Secretary of State Adolf Berle, whose portfolio
included the investigation of Nazi fronts and sympathizers in Latin
America, had had enough of Sloan and GM executives. Berle circulated
a memo asserting “that certain officials of General Motors were
sympathetic to or aligned with some pro-Axis groups....That this is
[a] ‘real Fifth Column’ and is much more sinister than many other
things which are going on at the present time.” Berle called for an
FBI investigation.
The FBI’s probe of GM senior executives with links to Hitler
found collusion with Germany by Mooney, but no evidence of any
disloyalty to America. The Aug. 2, 1941, summary of the
investigation clearly listed Sloan in the title of the report, but
Mooney’s was the only name mentioned in the investigative results.
However, in a separate report to FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, the
agent stated, “No derogatory information of any kind was developed
with respect to Alfred Pritchard Sloan Jr.”
Opel’s friendly Nazi custodian
On Dec. 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor was bombed. The United States
declared war on Japan. On Dec. 11, German diplomats in Washington
called at the State Department to deliver Germany’s declaration of
war against America. All direct communications between GM and its
Opel subsidiary in Germany were necessarily severed, although
historians have always wondered about indirect links through Denmark
where GM operated a longtime subsidiary. Ranking GM men from Denmark
were also in ranking positions both in Opel in Germany and GM in
America.
After Germany declared war on America, all American corporate
interests in Germany or under German control were systematically
placed under the jurisdiction of a Reich-appointed “custodian” for
enemy-owned property. In practice, the “custodian” was akin to a
court-appointed receiver. Generally, the Reich custodian’s duty was
not to dismember the firm or Aryanize it, but to continue to run the
enterprise as efficiently and profitably as possible, holding all
assets and profits in escrow until matters would be resolved after
the war. This generally meant re-appointing members of the
pre-existing management team, although these managers no longer
reported directly to their American masters in the United States.
In the case of Opel, Carl Luer, the longtime member of the Opel
Supervisory Board, company president and Nazi Party stalwart, was
appointed by the Reich to run Opel as custodian, but only some 11
months after America entered the war. In anticipation of the
outbreak of hostilities, GM had appointed Luer to be president of
Opel in late 1941, just before war broke out.
In other words, the existing GM-approved president of Opel
continued to run Opel during America’s war years. The company
continued as a major German war profiteer, and GM knew its
subsidiary was at the forefront of the Nazi war machine. An Aug. 27,
1944, New York Times article detailed that Opel was the principal
target of a 1,400-plane RAF bombing mission because its
35,000-worker plant was turning out crucial military transport and
was known to be developing rocket technology.
In the wartime months and years that ensued, 1941-1945, GM built
and operated some $900 million worth (about $120 billion in today’s
dollars) of defense manufacturing facilities for the Allies. Almost
all of the company’s undertakings were propped up by federal
programs that guaranteed profit and “cost-plus” contracts, various
subsidies, tax benefits and other incentives then available to
defense contractors to produce goods for the war effort. Secretary
of War Henry Stimson later explained that when a capitalist country
wages war, “you have got to let business make money out of the
process, or business won’t work.” Gen. Lucius Clay, who oversaw war
materiel contracts, confessed, “I had to put into production
schedule the largest procurement program the world had ever seen.
Where would I find somebody to do that? I went to General Motors.”
GM also reaped the financial benefits of its relationship with
the Third Reich. During the pre-war Hitler years, GM entered its
Opel proceeds under “reserves” instead of listing the profits as
ordinary income. Then during America’s war years GM declared it had
abandoned its Nazi subsidiary, and took a complete tax write-off
under special legislation signed by Roosevelt in October 1942. The
write-off of nearly $35 million created a tax reduction of
“approximately $22.7 million” or about $285 billion in 21st-century
money, according to an internal Opel document.
But Opel’s friendly Nazi custodian, Carl Luer, kept on making
profits for the company during those war years. Opel produced
trucks, bomber engines, land mines, torpedo detonators and other war
materiel, a significant amount of it by the sweat of thousands of
prisoner laborers or other coerced workers; some of those workers
were tortured if they did not meet expectations. Those profits and
GM’s 100 percent stock ownership were preserved by the Reich
custodian, even though GM and Opel ostensibly severed ties with each
other after America entered the war.
During the Hitler years, many of those excess profits were used
to acquire other companies and properties, only increasing Opel’s
assets in Germany. After the war, starting in 1948, GM began
regaining control over Opel operations and eventually its monumental
assets as well as blocked dividends. GM also collected some $33
million in “war reparations” because the Allies had bombed its
German facilities.
After the defeat of Berlin, GM and its executives, including
those who joined the government in Washington, then steered America
toward its gargantuan postwar boom. That boom was in large measure
powered by the constellation of direct and indirect economic
benefits delivered by the U.S. automobile industry.
The Transit Scam
Ironically, while GM was mobilizing the Third Reich, the company
was also leading a criminal conspiracy to monopolistically undermine
mass transit in dozens of American cities that would help addict the
United States to oil.
The war in Europe had only been over for 16 months when on Oct.
2, 1946, a memo from the Department of Justice landed on the desk of
J. Edgar Hoover, outlining the elements of the GM conspiracy.
At the center of the conspiracy was National City Lines, an
Enronesque company that suddenly arose in 1937, ostensibly run by
five barely educated Minnesota bus drivers, the Fitzgerald brothers.
Yet the Fitzgeralds miraculously marshaled millions of dollars to
buy up one failing trolley system after another. Soon, through a
patchwork of subsidiaries, the brothers owned or controlled transit
systems in more than 40 cities. Generally, when National City Lines
acquired the system, the tracks were pulled from the street, the
beloved electric trolleys were trashed or burned, and the whole
system was replaced with more expensive, unpopular and
environmentally hazardous motor buses that helped addict America to
oil.
The Justice Department discovered that National City Lines was
just a front company for General Motors, in league with Mack Truck,
Phillips Petroleum, Standard Oil of California and Firestone Tires —
all petroleum interests. The companies became the major preferred
stockholders of National City Lines, but operated behind the scenes.
The scheme worked this way: The manufacturers purchased NCL
preferred stock to acquire transit lines on condition that when the
systems were acquired, the trolleys would be dismantled and replaced
with motor buses. That is exactly what happened. All the
conspirators gained immensely when non-polluting electric systems
were replaced by oil-burners. Phillips and Standard sold oil
products. Firestone sold the tires. GM and Mack divvied up the bus
manufacturing and sales market according to an agreed-upon formula.
Transit systems in 16 states were converted, adversely affecting
millions of Americans, who had to pay higher fares for lesser, more
unpopular service. Dozens more cities were targeted in the $9.5
million scheme.
In April 1947, indictments alleging two counts of criminal
conspiracy were handed down against General Motors, Mack Truck,
Phillips Petroleum, Standard Oil of California and Firestone Tires,
as well as against numerous key executives of the companies.
The defendants were found guilty on one of the two counts:
conspiring to monopolize the bus business by creating a network of
petroleum-based transit companies that were forbidden to use
transportation or technology products other than those supplied by
the defendants themselves. The jury found the defendants not guilty
on the count alleging a conspiracy to actually control those transit
systems. On April 1, 1949, the judge handed down his sentence: a
$5,000 fine to each corporate defendant except Standard, which was
fined $1,000. As for National City Lines, president E. Roy
Fitzgerald and his co-conspirators at GM and the other companies,
they too were fined. Each was ordered to “forfeit and pay to the
United States of America a fine in the amount of one dollar.”
The cases were appealed — even the one-dollar penalties — all the
way to the United States Supreme Court, which allowed the
convictions to stand. The government filed a civil action against
the same circle of companies trying to stop their continued conduct.
But the government was unsuccessful. Undaunted, National City Lines
and its many subsidiaries continued into the 1950s to acquire,
convert and operate urban transit systems using evolved methods.
Edwin Black is the author of the award-winning “IBM and the
Holocaust” and the recently published “Internal Combustion: How
Corporations and Governments Addicted the World to Oil and Derailed
the Alternatives.” |